Aviran's Place Forum Index Aviran's Place
The Technology Forum
 
 Home PageHome Page  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

* Google set to unveil priority inbox for Gmail * AMD Dropping the ATI Brand Name * Toshiba developing no-glasses 3-D televisions * Dell launches $100 smart phone in US on AT&T * Google Chrome tablet computer ‘on sale in November’ * Israeli mathematician wins Fields Medal *

According to Google Bush is a failure

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Aviran's Place Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TheHog
Level 2
Level 2


Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:44 pm    Post subject: According to Google Bush is a failure Reply with quote

Just run a Google search on the word failure and press I'm Feeling Lucky
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Google_Bomb
Level 1
Level 1


Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Posts: 9
Location: Maine

PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:10 am    Post subject: Re: According to Google Bush is a failure Reply with quote

It's a Google_bomb Laughing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bomb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

A Google bomb or Google wash is an attempt to influence the ranking of a given site in results returned by the Google search engine. Due to the way that Google's PageRank algorithm works, a website will be ranked higher if the sites that link to that page all use consistent anchor text.

See Spamdexing for the practice of deliberately and dishonestly modifying HTML pages to increase the chance of them being placed close to the beginning of search engine results, or to influence the category to which the page is assigned in a dishonest manner.

For example, if a user registers many domains and all of them link to a main site with the text "... is a living legend" then searching for "living legend" on Google will return the main site higher in the ranking, even if the phrase "living legend" doesn't appear on the main site. A common means of exploiting this is through weblogs, where although the entry may disappear from the main page quickly, the short-term effects of a link can dramatically affect the ranking of a given site. Empirical results indicate that it does not take a large number of websites to achieve a Googlebomb. The effect has been achieved with only a handful of dedicated weblogs.

The above statement has to be qualified, however. A handful of blog links will not Google bomb someone like Amazon out of the top results for "books," for example. In fact, Googlebombs have generally had an impact on relatively "non-competitive" terms, where there's no particular page that seems to be necessarily the right answer.

The technique was first discussed on April 6, 2001 in an article by Adam Mathes [1]. In that article, he coined the term "Google bombing" and explained how he discovered that Google used the technique to calculate page rankings. He found that a search for "internet rockstar" returned the website of a Ben Brown as the first result, even though "internet rockstar" did not appear anywhere on Brown's webpage. He reasoned that Google's algorithm returned it as the first result because many fan sites that linked to Brown's website used that phrase on their own pages.

Mathes began testing his theory by setting out to make the website of his friend Andy Pressman the number one result for a query of "talentless hack". He gave instructions for creating websites and links to Pressman's website with the text of the link reading "talentless hack". Sure enough, as other webloggers joined in his Googlebombing campaign, Pressman's website became the number one result in a Google search for "talentless hack". (Ironically, by 2004, Mathes's own site was the number one Google result of this search term.)

However, the first Google bomb mentioned in the popular press may have occurred accidentally in 1999, when users discovered that the query "more evil than Satan" returned Microsoft's home page. Now, it returns links to several news articles on the discovery.

Ironically, Google bombs often end their life by being too popular or well known, thereby attaining a mention in well regarded web journals and knocking the bomb off the top spot. It is sometimes commented that Google bombing need not be countered because of this self-disassembly.

In addition, the entire notion of "Google bombs" might be better described as "link bombing," given that these campaigns can certainly have an effect on other search engines, as well. All major search engine make use of link analysis and thus can be impacted. Thus, a search for "miserable failure" on 1 June 2005 brought up the official George W. Bush biography number one on Google, Yahoo and MSN and number 2 on Ask Jeeves. On 2 June 2005 it was reported by Yooter Interactive that George Bush is now ranked first for the keyword 'failure' as well as 'miserable failure' in both Google and Yahoo.

The BBC in reporting on Googlebombs in 2002 actually used the headline of "Google Hit By Link Bombers," acknowledging to some degree the idea of "link bombing." In 2004, the Search Engine Watch site argued that the term should be "link bombing" because of the impact beyond Google and continues to use that term as more accurate.

Nevertheless, "Google bombing" was added to the New Oxford American Dictionary in May 2005
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
i
Level 1
Level 1


Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:45 am    Post subject: Re: According to Google Bush is a failure Reply with quote

Google, much like non citizens, fortunately do not have the right to vote! Thank God we have a president who rightly values our sovereignty!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Aviran's Place Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group